Department IX

Maria Gall
Office – (702) 671-4395
Fax – (702) 671-4394
Law Clerk – (702) 671-4392
Email – dept09lc@clarkcountycourts.us
Location – RJC Courtroom 16A
Regional Justice Center
200 Lewis Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89155
The Honorable Maria Gall serves on the Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada. She has an all civil assignment. Following the nomination of the Judicial Selection Commission, Governor Steve Sisolak appointed Judge Gall to the bench in June 2022.
Judge Gall was raised primarily in and around Fort Knox, Kentucky, by her mother who immigrated from South Korea, and where her father and step-father were career U.S. Army. Judge Gall graduated cum laude from the University of Kentucky Rosenberg College of Law in 2006, where she served as production editor of the Kentucky Law Journal. In addition to her law degree, Judge Gall holds a Master of Science from the London School of Economics & Political Science and a Bachelor of Music from Vanderbilt University. She is a trained concert pianist.
Following law school, Judge Gall served as a federal law clerk to the Honorable Charles R. Simpson III, judge for the U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky. Judge Gall began her practice in New York City, as a litigator with Cadwalader, Wickerhsam & Taft, the oldest, continuously run law firm in the United States. Judge Gall left the practice of law for a short time to serve as a visiting assistant professor of law at the University of Kentucky, where she taught business associations (corporations), international human rights law, and professional responsibility. Upon returning to practice, Judge Gall joined the law firm of Stoll Keenon Ogden and then Ballard Spahr in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Judge Gall became the first woman partner of Ballard Spahr’s Las Vegas office in 2019, where she practiced complex commercial litigation. She co-led Ballard Women, a business resource group for the firm’s 250+ women attorneys, and maintained an active pro bono practice, often partnering with the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada to handle challenging pro bono litigations and appeals. Judge Gall also served on the steering committee for the firm’s Racial Equality and Diversity Initiative and is a Legal Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) fellow.
Judge Gall is committed to fairness and integrity on the bench and advancing diversity in the legal profession.
Courtroom Protocol
No weapons are allowed. There is no eating, drinking, smoking or chewing gum in any courtroom.
Proper courtroom attire is required. No shorts or tank tops are allowed in the courtroom, shoes are required. T-shirts, which show offensive slogans or pictures, are not allowed. Hats should be removed before entering the courtroom.
While in the courtroom, sit quietly when court is in session. Do not talk or whisper. The court proceedings are being recorded by a court recorder and noise can interfere with the preparation of this important record.
All beepers, cellular telephones, and electronic devices must be turned off before entering the courtroom. Avoid reading newspapers, or books in the courtrooms, particularly if your use of such material may be a distraction to others.
Attorneys are expected to maintain the highest ethical standards at all times, and to strictly adhere to the opportunities, requirements, limitations, and deadlines set by the judge. All counsel are to be punctual for all conferences, hearings and trials. They are to be civil to one another as well as to all parties, witnesses, and court personnel – whether in front of a jury or the court.
Documents
Civil Bench Trial Procedure
Jury Trial Information
Model Order for Gambling Treatment Diversion Court
Deposition Designation Form
Department 09 Zoom Information (Effective January 29th 2024)
Current Assignment
- Department IX is an all business court department.
Motion Calendar Schedule
- Department IX typically hears status checks, non-substantive orders to show cause, and case management conferences at 9:00 AM on Tuesdays and Thursdays, followed by law and motion at 9:30 AM.
Other and Special Settings
- Department IX may provide special settings for motions and other matters, either of its own accord or upon request by counsel. If, after an opposition is filed, all counsel to a case believe that a motion warrants a special setting due to its complexity, counsel should email the Department IX Law Clerk, cc’ing all other counsel, requesting the setting, proposed dates and times for the setting, and the amount of time each party seeks for argument. The Department will review the request, and if appropriate, will reset the hearing.
Regular Chambers Calendar
- Department IX has a regular chambers calendar every Friday. Matters set on the chambers calendar are decided upon the written submissions. The court will issue a minute order or a written order after a decision is made.
- At this time, the following matters are automatically set on chambers calendar, although the court may set other matters on its chambers calendar after an opportunity to review the briefs:
- Lower Court Appeals
- Motion for Additur
- Motion to Amend Complaint
- Motion to Associate Counsel
- Motion for Attorney’s Fees
- Motion for Clarification
- Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
- Motion to Consolidate
- Motions to Extend/Enlarge Time to Serve Complaint and/or to Serve Complaint by Publication
- Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines
- Motion for Stay
- Motion to Interplead Funds
- Motion to Intervene
- Motion for Judgment Against Garnishee
- Motion for Leave
- Motions in Limine
- Motion for Reconsideration
- Motion to Release Funds
- Motion to Seal and/or Redact
- Motion to Substitute Parties
- Motion for Voluntary Dismissal
- Motion to Withdraw as Attorney of Record
- Objection to Discovery Commissioner’s Recommendation
- Petition for Compromise of Minor’s Claim
- Pro Hac Vice
Injunctive Relief
- Noticed applications for temporary restraining orders and motions for preliminary injunctions are heard as any other motions, subject to possible special setting for the hearing.
- Unless unusual circumstances exist, EX PARTE applications for temporary restraining orders are not permitted. An affidavit of counsel in accordance with NRCP 65(b) regarding efforts to contact the party seeking to be enjoined or the party’s counsel must be provided with the application.
- Ex parte applications for temporary restraining orders shall be presented to the court for review, upon which time the court will determine if ex parte relief is appropriate. If the court determines that ex parte relief is appropriate, the court will issue an ex parte temporary restraining order and schedule a hearing for the preliminary injunction motion. If the court determines that ex parte relief is not appropriate, the court may schedule an in person or telephonic conference with all parties. The court rarely grants ex parte temporary restraining orders.
- At the time of hearing a motion for preliminary injunction, the court will hear argument and offers of proof and determine if an evidentiary hearing is necessary. If not, the court will rule; if so, such a hearing will be scheduled. If a temporary restraining order has been entered, it will likely be extended pending the evidentiary hearing in accordance with NRCP 65(b).
- The court requires the submission of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in injunction cases, in accordance with NRCP 52.
Motions to Shorten Time
Department IX accepts motions on order shortening time submitted to the department inbox. The party submitting such a motion must carbon copy (CC) all other parties on their submission to the department inbox. Motions to shorten time will not be granted except upon an unsworn declaration under penalty of perjury or affidavit of counsel describing the circumstances claimed to constitute good cause and that justify shortening of time. Good cause does not encompass circumstances within counsel’s or a party’s control. Good cause for purposes of motions to withdraw as counsel does not encompass upcoming court deadlines.
If granted, the order shortening time must be served upon all parties promptly. Per EDCR 2.26, an order shortening the time of the hearing to less than 10 days may NOT be served by mail. In no event may the hearing of a motion be shortened to less than 1 full judicial day.
Court Recorder for the Court’s Official Record
Gina Villani – (702) 671-4391 – villanig@clarkcountycourts.us
Media Requests
This department adheres to the presumption that all court proceedings that are open to the public are subject to electronic coverage. Media requests are, therefore, granted as a matter of course, including on less than 24 hours’ notice.
Unopposed Motions
- This department may grant unopposed motions in advance of the hearing date.
Motions Considered without Oral Argument
Parties should submit written briefs that thoroughly address all issues and arguments related to each motion and include all exhibits, affidavits, and evidence that they deem relevant to the disposition of the matter. In appropriate cases, the court may, after reviewing the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, deem that oral argument would not be necessary or helpful to the disposition of the matter and may instead decide the matter based on the written submissions.
Submission of Orders
- If the court directs counsel to prepare a written order, preparing counsel shall draft the order in Microsoft Word format and provide a copy to all other counsel at least 7 days before the order is due for submission (which, pursuant to EDCR 7.21, is 14 days after notification of the court’s decision.)
- Preparing counsel is to reduce the court’s decision to a written order, including with those points and authorities needed to fully implement the court’s decision.
- The written order is not an opportunity to relitigate the merits of the parties’ briefs. If the parties are unable to agree on the form and content of the proposed order, they should each e-mail to the Department Law Clerk, cc’ing all other counsel, a clean copy of their respective proposed order, with non-preparing/objecting counsel additionally providing a redline of the competing order.
- There should be no commentary accompanying the submissions, whether within the documents, in the form of a cover letter, or otherwise.
- The court shall review any contested orders and enter an order that accurately reflects the court’s decision, including with any modifications the court deems appropriate.